What is a JayDiva?

JayDiva (noun) a writer of blogs who is an attorney, feminist, New Englander, child advocate, reader, hiker, cancer survivor, Mormon.



Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Your Doll's House?

The other day I was in New York City talking to a youngish professional.  He was asking if I knew a particular woman whom he thought could have been a mutual acquaintance and, in describing her, mentioned that she “is very into Women’s Lib…”  Women’s Lib?  Seriously?  I thought they only used that term in 1970’s England.  Apparently not.  But it got me thinking about antiquated women’s issues that are STILL women’s issues in the modern world, no matter what you call them.  What I call one of these myriad issues is faking perfection.



One of my favorite modern takes on this long-standing issue is encapsulated by a short film called Nora, based on the 1879 play written by Henrik Ibsen, A Doll's House.  The play has been a favorite of mine since I first read it in college.  The premise, in a nutshell, is that the lead, Nora, is a young mother of three, living in a world concerned with appearances, choked by her shallow life revolving around her husband and her children, whom she plays with like dear, little toys.  Nora comes to the realization that she has never developed an independent self— that she floated from being merely decorative in her father’s home to being merely decorative in her husband’s home, and she is now perpetuating the pattern with her own children.  Determined to take back her life, she abruptly leaves her family to find herself, a person whom she has never even met. (And this in the 1800s!)



Sounds selfish, I suppose, but the idea is that society robbed her of her own life and she was righting that wrong by not only getting her own life back, but also by disrupting the pattern that would have inevitably robbed her daughter of life as well. 

(Watch the modern short film HERE)

I was introduced to this play by a professor of Humanities.  At one point, this professor had also moonlighted as an LDS Bishop.  When counseling young, engaged couples, he would often gift them with a copy of this play.  An odd gift at the time of one’s engagement, but his message was meant to zing straight into their hearts a couple of important questions— 
     Are you really ready to give up your independence?  
    Will you regret this decision in a few years and have your life crumble to bits, taking down others in its fall?  

Sadly, I have known many young women to jump into the arms (and wedding bands) of men without first knowing themselves.  Sometimes I think that many of these young women want an Instagram post of their bedazzled right hand, adorned with 300 likes, far more than they actually want to their intended husbands.  

I am not even 30 years old and have seen more of my peers, even “righteous” people, get divorced than you would believe.  And I think it has a lot to do with this— a young woman asked to become subservient to the wants of others, before knowing what she actually wants, is likely to someday realize that she had been robbed of her own free will.

Building a life that is what we believe others want to see, versus building a life that is what we want it to be, is killing the mental and emotional health of so many women.  In a very metaphoric way, I think that writer Jessi Klein hit the nail on the head when she compared women "enjoying" a bath to women retreating from their unjust lives.  Sounds like a stretch, but read what she had to say in The New Yorker recently:

ILLUSTRATION BY JEAN JULLIEN

To me, there has always been something vaguely miserable about bathing. The soaking, the sitting, the water getting dirty and cold, the inevitable random hair floating up against your skin, the pruning. It makes me feel as if I were stewing up the world’s saddest soup out of myself. It hurts my neck.    I get hot and thirsty in the bath, and when I stand up I always feel like I’m going to pass out. Because I feel less clean than when I got in, I have to take a shower afterward. Ultimately, it feels like I’ve gone backward, hygiene-wise.
But these are just my physical issues with bathing. My conceptual problems begin with the same ideology some adman for Calgon decided to trade on forty years ago: the idea that the bath is the last space a woman can escape to, like a gazelle fleeing a lion by running into water up to her neck. Getting in the bath seems a kind of surrender to the idea that we can’t really make it on land, that we’ve lost the fight for a bedroom corner or even just our own chair in the living room. And, once the bath becomes our last resort, a Stockholm syndrome sets in. We cede all other space to the husband or boyfriend or kids and then convince ourselves that the bath is awesome. Yay, I’m submerged in a watery trough! This is incredible! This is my happy place! I definitely wouldn’t prefer to just be lying in my own bed watching “Bachelor in Paradise”! I would much rather have grainy bath crystals imprinting themselves into my butt than be in my own room! What luxury! This is perfect!
This is why Virginia Woolf stressed the importance of having a room of one’s own. If you don’t fight for it, don’t insist on it, and don’t sacrifice for it, you might find yourself in that increasingly tepid water, pruning and sweating while you dream of other things.

~ Jessi Klein, The Bath: A Polemic 



Now wasn’t that just a tad more illuminating that scanning your Facebook feed for the fifth time today?  Wasn’t that more thought-provoking than those new dance moves or cute animal interactions that you just watched on YouTube?  Such unworthy media simply wastes time.  And if there is anything that I have learned about mortality, it is that time is of the essence. 



Here are some interesting quotes:

Regarding the internet, “You can get caught up in endless loops of triviality that waste your time and degrade your potential.” 

~Randall L. Ridd, The Choice Generation



 “A prominent thought leader, Arthur C. Brooks, has emphasized this point. He observes that when using social media, we tend to broadcast the smiling details of our lives but not the hard times at school or work. We portray an incomplete life—sometimes in a self-aggrandizing or fake way. We share this life, and then we consume the ‘almost exclusively … fake lives of [our] social media “friends.”’ Brooks asserts, ‘How could it not make you feel worse to spend part of your time pretending to be happier than you are, and the other part of your time seeing how much happier others seem to be than you?’
“Sometimes it feels like we are drowning in frivolous foolishness, nonsensical noise, and continuous contention.”
~Quentin L. Cook, Choose Wisely





Carve out a space for you, your ideas, and your dreams that is larger than a screenshot or selfie, and even larger than a bathtub.  MUCH larger.  Create a life that is real, not just a doll-like semblance of reality.  If we only have one mortality to live, it ought to be more meaningful than a social media-fueled pretense of a happy life.


Be Nora: find yourself.





Sunday, February 22, 2015

"Feminism"

Feminism” has become a loaded term, to say the least.

For me, the word often conjures images of bra-burning, sexually promiscuous radicals of the 1970’s.  It also makes me think of 1980’s shoulder pads and power suits.

Many women hear the word “feminist” and cannot shake the ridiculous stereotype of Lesbians who think the world would be better without any men at all.



I attneded a conservative university (understatement!) and I recall hearing my female peers again and again—typically when in the company of a young man they hoped would woo them—declare, 

“No, I’m not a feminist!   
Call me traditional, but I love men and I don’t think I need
 to be better than them to feel good about myself.”

This stance always confused me.  Being a feminist does not mean you can't love men.  It also doesn't mean that you can’t be happy and satisfied with yourself unless you are somehow fundamentally viewed as better (whatever that means…) than a man.  In fact, you don’t even have to be a female to be a feminist.

So why the visceral, negative reaction to the very word—feminist, I wonder?

It always appeared to me that these college ladies were convinced that touting themselves as “feminists” would make them less desirable for men or somehow less worthy of male admiration.  As if a real woman who respects men, wants to have children with a man someday, and doesn’t want to immediately tear patriarchy to pieces cannot possibly also be a feminist.

ERROR.

This is incorrect.

Feminism has come to be defined by its connotation, rather than its denotation.  So let’s educate ourselves.

feminism
[fem-uh-niz-uh m] 
noun
 The doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.

Do you see anything about bringing men down?  Do you see anything about being a Lesbian?  Do you even see anything about being a female? 

Me neither.


Feminism is about bringing women up, not about bringing men down.  It is about allowing women the same rights and opportunities to rise, succeed, and lead in political, economic, social, business, educational (ETC.) realms that men currently enjoy.

Whether you want to admit it or not, even though we have had the right to vote for a hundred years, there are still many other rights –spoken or implied—that are currently out of our reach.

I had a Womens Studies professor from Stanford University who bemoaned that she could never quite get the opportunities to have buddy-buddy time with her (mostly male) superiors because (get this!) she was aware that most important promotional decisions were made among the top men while they were all together AT THE URINAL in the men’s bathroom. 

     1)   Gross.
     2)  Wow.  Talk about going to great lengths to keep the ladies from being a part of the discussion.

So she fought fire with fire and started making smalltalk with the few female executives in the ladies restroom, too!  She claimed she would never have gotten the job she ultimately received if she hadn’t been building cliques in these intimate moments.

But should it really be like that?  Should we have to go behind closed doors to try to scam our way to the top in secret societies and compacts that equal those of our male competitors?  Well, I don’t think they have to be our competitors at all.  I think that the most progress will be made when men are our allies in the cause of equal rights for women.

Emma Watson made big headlines by thinking this way recently in a now-famous speech she made at the United Nations.



She did a great job, so I will quote much of what she stated:

“Today we are launching a campaign He For She. I am reaching out to you because we need your help. We must try to mobilize as many men and boys as possible to be advocates for change. We don’t just want to talk about it. We want to try and make sure it’s tangible…

“The more I spoke about feminism, the more I realized that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain is that this has to stop. For the record, feminism by definition is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. It is the theory of political, economic and social equality of the sexes.

“[My] recent research has shown me that feminism has become an unpopular word. Women are choosing not to identify as feminists. Apparently, [women’s expression is] seen as too strong, too aggressive, anti-men, unattractive.

“Why has the word become such an unpopular one? I think it is right I am paid the same as my male counterparts. I think it is right that I should make decisions about my own body. I think it is right that women be involved on my behalf in the policies and decisions that affect my life. I think it is right that socially, I am afforded the same respect as men.
“It is not the word that is important. It is the idea and the ambition behind it because not all women received the same rights I have. In fact, statistically, very few have.

“In 1997, Hillary Clinton made a famous speech in Beijing about women’s rights. Sadly, many that she wanted to change are still true today. Less than 30% of the audience were male. How can we effect change in the world when only half of it is invited to participate in the conversation?

“Men, I would like to give this opportunity to extend your formal invitation. Gender equality is your issue, too. To date, I’ve seen my father’s role as a parent being valued less by society. I’ve seen young men suffering from illness, unable to ask for help for fear it will make them less of a man. I’ve seen men fragile and insecure by what constitutes male success. Men don’t have the benefits of equality, either.

“We don’t want to talk about men being imprisoned by gender stereotypes but I can see that they are. When they are free, things will change for women as a natural consequence. If men don’t have to be aggressive, women won’t be compelled to be submissive. If men don’t need to control, women won’t have to be controlled.

Both men and women should feel free to be strong…We can all be freer and this is what HeForShe is about. It’s about freedom. I want men to take up this mantle so their daughters, sisters and mothers can be free from prejudice but also so their sons have permission to be vulnerable and human, too and in doing so, be a more true and complete version of themselves.”
...




Really, great!  Watching her speak about this made me very emotional.  Most young women in her shoes respond to film-made fame with plastic surgery and materialism.  Instead, she went to college and became a Goodwill Ambassador for UN Women, so she can use her name to forward a cause she feels strongly about.  Now there is a role model. 

She referenced the #HeForShe movement in her speech.

Here is their website:  http://www.heforshe.org/

Self-described as a Solidarity Movement for Gender Equality, it invites men to assist women in reaching parity.



In response, a subsequent speaker before the UN in 2014 announced a conference to discuss how to reach gender equality.  Sounds like nothing new until you find out that this conference is for men only.  At first that may seem like a step backward to exclude women, but I think it is actually a revolutionary leap forward to have men championing this issue. 


Here’s some excerpts from an article about the announcement:


During a speech before the United Nations, Iceland's Foreign Minister Gunnar Bragi said his country and Suriname are convening a conference to talk about gender equality.

The catch? Only men and boys are invited.

Bragi said that his country wanted to do its part to "promote gender equality." So, he announced:


"We want to bring men and boys to the table on gender equality in a positive way.

"Iceland and Suriname will convene a ‘Barbershop’ conference in January 2015 where men will discuss gender equality with other men, with a special focus on addressing violence against women. This will be a unique conference as it will be the first time at the United Nations that we bring together only men leaders to discuss gender equality."


As the AP reports, Bragi was making the announcement in commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the 1995 U.N. women's conference in which world leaders declared, "women's rights are human rights."

(At U.N., Iceland Announces Men-Only Conference On Gender Equality
by Eyder Peralta)



Emma Watson also referenced the fact that “feminism” has become a nasty word among so many young women; an undesirable trait if you’re trying to catch a man.


To that point, the following book is somewhat controversial and, yes, she uses somewhat vulgar language.  But I cannot shake this one excerpt in particular from my mind.  I first heard it read over the radio by the author in her delightful accent and I cheered in my car as I listened:


We need to reclaim the word 'feminism'. We need the word 'feminism' back real bad. When statistics come in saying that only 29% of American women would describe themselves as feminist - and only 42% of British women - I used to think, What do you think feminism IS, ladies? What part of 'liberation for women' is not for you? Is it freedom to vote? The right not to be owned by the man you marry? The campaign for equal pay? 'Vogue' by Madonna? Jeans? Did all that good shit GET ON YOUR NERVES? Or were you just DRUNK AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY?”

But, of course, you might be asking yourself, 'Am I a feminist? I might not be. I don't know! I still don't know what it is! I'm too knackered and confused to work it out. That curtain pole really still isn't up! I don't have time to work out if I am a women's libber! There seems to be a lot to it. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?'

I understand.

So here is the quick way of working out if you're a feminist. Put your hand in your pants.

a) Do you have a vagina? and
b) Do you want to be in charge of it?

If you said 'yes' to both, then congratulations! You're a feminist.


And the round of applause goes to Caitlin Moran, author of How To Be a Woman.



Still confused about whether or not you want to embrace that word, feminism?

Never fear!  Modern day feminist are not only embracing the word, but re-defining it to fit their idea of women’s rights and equality in the current day.

To combat the negative stereotype of “feminists,” essayist Roxane Gay refers to herself as a “Bad Feminist” in that she fully supports women’s issues and women’s equality, but she doesn’t fit into your mental image of what a feminist should be—and she’s okay with that!


NPR writer Annalisa Quinn reviewed her recent book of essays titled Bad Feminist, and concluded/quoted the following:


"I am failing as a woman," she writes in one essay. "I am failing as a feminist. To freely accept the feminist label would not be fair to good feminists. If I am, indeed, a feminist, I am a rather bad one. I am a mess of contradictions."

In a different essay, she says she is "trying to support what I believe in, trying to do some good in this world, trying to make some noise with my writing while also being myself: a woman who loves pink and likes to get freaky and sometimes dances her ass off to music she knows, she knows, is terrible for women and who sometimes plays dumb with repairmen because it's just easier to let them feel macho than it is to stand on the moral high ground."

But is feminism that monolithic?" I ask. "Are those necessarily contradictions?" She says, "I think the way feminism is talked about is monolithic. A lot of what I'm exploring in Bad Feminist is how I'm overcoming the preconceived notions I've had about feminism and what feminism actually is, and confusing feminists with feminism."

Gay's problem might be that she's not very good at faking. Most people have an idea of who they are or who they want to be (good feminist, happy person), and go about projecting some more or less consistent version of it. Gay doesn't, or if she does, she's terrible at it.

"I do have personal boundaries and I'm actually a very private person, but there's no point in pretending I'm always cheerful," she says. "I'm not. That's just not me, and I don't feel the need to create a persona. And I don't feel the need to play the games that sometimes people play, like projecting a perfect life or a happy life or very well crafted insecurities. No, I kind of have them all."



Amen.

You can like imported perfume, and leopard print high heels, and even secretly indulge in the occasional Chris Brown song and still think that equality is important.  Being true to your own feelings and beliefs and being committed to providing an environment where you and others have the liberty to achieve is paramount to fitting within the parameters of an old, typecast label.  


Don't be afraid to be called a feminist, embrace it!  Make the title yours, make it serve you!  Fear not, because you are your own person and cannot possibly fit within the confines of one politically-charged term.  So don't think of yourself so one-dimensionally.  For me, I am a feminist.  AND I love to swim.  AND I love to wear dresses.  AND I love my husband.  AND I was honored to see Michelle Obama recently.  AND I'm religious.  AND I am registered Independent voter.  AND I am a cancer survivor.  AND I love to study Near Eastern history.  And, and, and...  We are each far too complicated to be afraid that ONE label with an old, negative connotation will somehow change us or make us overall less desirable or less worthy of love.



So it appears to me that the so-called “New Feminism” is really just an effort to eradicate the bad, likely false, connotations lingering from the “Old” ERA-era feminists.  The bra-burners and man-haters or yore. 

 But as we try to free ourselves from labels that scare away people who should be our allies, let us not also improperly label our forbearers in this movement.  One of the legal champions of women's rights from a fading era is US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.  She is a hero to many a law student.

(Probably an inappropriate side-note, but I saw this Halloween costume of The Notorious RBG at the time this was first published, and it cracked me up!  See, I’m a bad feminist too… )



I recently read an interview with Justice Ginsburg and was inspired by some of her wisdom.  Published in September 2014, she (“RBG”) was interviewed by Jeffrey Rosen (“JR”) and here is an excerpt:


JR: How much did your experience with the ACLU influence the kind of justice you became?
RBG: When I was writing briefs13 for the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, I tried to write them so that a justice who agreed with me could write his opinion from the brief. I conceived of myself in large part as a teacher. There wasn’t a great understanding of gender discrimination. People knew that race discrimination was an odious thing, but there were many who thought that all the gender-based differentials in the law operated benignly in women’s favor. So my objective was to take the Court step by step to the realization, in Justice Brennan’s words, that the pedestal on which some thought women were standing all too often turned out to be a cage.


JR: How has the dynamic on the Court changed as it has added more women?
RBG: Justice O’Connor and I were together for more than twelve years and in every one of those twelve years, sooner or later, at oral argument one lawyer or another would call me Justice O’Connor. They were accustomed to the idea that there was a woman on the Supreme Court and her name was Justice O’Connor. Sandra would often correct the attorney, she would say, “I’m Justice O’Connor, she’s Justice Ginsburg.” The worst times were the years I was alone. The image to the public entering the courtroom was eight men, of a certain size, and then this little woman sitting to the side. That was not a good image for the public to see.14 But now, with the three of us on the bench, I am no longer lonely and my newest colleagues are not shrinking violets. Not this term but the term before, Justice Sotomayor beat out Justice Scalia as the justice who asks the most questions during argument.15

JR: What’s your message to the new generation of feminists who really look to you as a role model?
RBG: Work for the things that you care about. I think of the ’70s, when many young women supported an Equal Rights Amendment. I was a proponent of the ERA. The women of my generation and my daughter’s generation, they were very active in moving along the social change that would result in equal citizenship stature for men and women. One thing that concerns me is that today’s young women don’t seem to care that we have a fundamental instrument of government that makes no express statement about the equal citizenship stature of men and women. They know there are no closed doors anymore, and they may take for granted the rights that they have.



Work for the things you care about.

Doesn’t that apply to just about everything?



Equality is something that I care about.  We think we live in a “free country” or in the “modern world” but people’s rights are being trampled all the time.  Slumlords rule over impoverished renters.  Women are held hostage in their own homes by violent partners.  Children cower under a silent shroud of abuse.  Government employees turn a blind eye when inmates or arrestees are beaten near to death when their supposed protectors get annoyed with them.

There are many brave people fighting for justice and equality on so many fronts.  My hope is that more ladies AND gentlemen join the fight on behalf of gender equality, so that half of the planet is not immediately placed in second class at birth.



I am so encouraged when I particularly hear of men taking on this task, as a human right worth fighting for.

I saw some beautiful photographs highlighted by a BBC interview of a photographer for their 100 Women series. 

Photographer, blogger and poet Nana Kofi Acquah uses his travels around Africa to chronicle the lives of women at their most accomplished and at their most vulnerable…A self-declared male feminist, he says his mission is to change the narrative around African women where they are often portrayed as victims of circumstance.”

 "If a woman wants her children to go to school, if she wants anything better, she has to work twice as hard as her brother. But what African women have in common is a beautiful, strong spirit. I see that everywhere I go, even in cultures where they look suppressed and downtrodden. They are strong fighters."

 "A cousin once told me that he would never marry a woman who was more educated than he was. That insecurity he expressed as a teenager is the same insecurity I see in a lot of men, even well-educated men. When a man is insecure in front of a powerful, successful woman, I want to know why."
 Alimata Ouedraogo is the president of a weavers group in Ponsomtenga, Burkina Faso. Some of the fabrics they weave end up on the big fashion shows in the world. "When I got there they were weaving for some designer from Japan. She was also very proud that she was learning to read and write."
 Old Fadama, also known as Sodom and Gomorrah, is a slum in Ghana's capital, Accra. These young migrant workers had saved some money to build a plywood and aluminium home, which was demolished by the government. "I'm sure that they built it again. They never give up," the photographer said.
 "The love of my grandmother, the lessons she taught me - and for my mother - made me consider myself as a feminist and put myself in a position to strongly push women's issues, any time I can," he said.
 "For me, feminism is when we can create a world where a woman has the same rights as a man. I believe my daughter has the same rights as my sons," the photographer said.





To the strong and courageous women and men around the world who struggle for survival and do so much to carve out a better life for themselves and their daughters—you are not alone.

Its The Little Things


You think you know what Mormon women look like?
 
Tacky images of a blonde Utah housewife making Jell-O come to mind, perhaps? 

When people find out I'm Mormon, you wouldn't believe how many times the next questions is either "Are all of you people blonde?!" or "I have to ask...does all your family live in Utah?"  

Uh, no and no.  

This is a WORLD-WIDE church!  Forget Utah, most Mormons actually live outside of the USA rather than in it!  Fact!)


Well, watch the 90 minute video linked below and prepare to have your mind blown.

Here’s a LINK to watch the recent Women’s Session of the October 2014 General Conference of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.


Okay, so you read a news article or two about the squashed Ordain Women movement and now think you’re an expert on LDS women while concluding, “Wow, these poor Mormon women are oppressed and most of them don’t even care!”


Well I was pleasantly surprised while watching the FIRST annual "Women’s Conference" this past week.  I can’t put my finger on why, but the Ordain Women movement never had any traction with me.  I saw their point, I felt their pain, but I thought their approach sucked, and I never felt strongly enough about it to play along. 

If you know my politics, that will probably surprise you.  But I’m a lawyer, and I understand precedent and I understand framing your issue in terms that are workable for governing bodies to utilize in order to appropriately enact change, and I thought the Ordain Women organizers were going about their mission, even if it was a noble one, all wrong.

For those of us to the political and social left of a general Latter-day Saint congregation member, particularly among the ladies, I think that we were all happy to see some very visible changes in the church’s esteem for women and overall approach to this year’s Women’s Conference session.


If you are not familiar with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ General Conference culture—here is a primer:


The Church holds a General Conference twice a year—in April and October—that is broadcast from Salt Lake City to meetinghouses across the globe, and is also streamed live on the internet, and stored online for later viewing.  The General Conference takes place over a weekend (church services get cancelled that week and people are encouraged to watch General Conference instead, although it is not mandatory) and consists of 5 sessions + a Women’s meeting.  Four of the sessions are “General” sessions, ie, for everyone, including kids.  These are each two hours long and take place on Saturday morning and afternoon as well as Sunday morning and afternoon.  The fifth session is on Saturday evening and is a “Priesthood” session, for males 12 and older.  The Women’s meeting usually takes place a week or two before the Conference weekend, also on a Saturday evening, and alternates between a meeting designed for Young Women (12 and up) or for Relief Society (women 18 and up).

Sessions each include an opening and closing prayer, hymns –usually sung by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir or another local choir of LDS people—and talks are given by male and female church leaders on topics of their own choosing, based on the scriptures- including The Holy Bible and the Book of Mormon.


This year marked the very FIRST time when the Young Women/Relief Society alternate model was abandoned in favored of a combined Women’s Session for all ladies 8 and up.  And it was described in the meeting as the “opening session” of the October 2014 General Conference—not just a bonus meeting that didn’t really count as a "session" of General Conference.  Like the Priesthood Session, this was an actual session of General Conference!  So I guess there are now SIX sessions!

All this may not sound like a big deal, and it may sound like mere semantics, but it represents (in my opinion) HUGE progress in recognizing that women need spiritual guidance from women leaders on issues that pertain to them, just like men do, and that a designated session for women deserves equal standing to the men’s session.




Looking back, it was only at the most recent General Conference in April that a woman gave a prayer in a General Session of conference!  Hard to believe it took so long, but it finally happened, and it did not go unnoticed by the ladies.  And at this, the “opening session” of the October 2014 General Conference, not only did a woman give the opening prayer, but a black South African woman gave the opening prayer!  I cried.  Just ask my husband, in his words, I “was boo-hoo-ing” all night.


And how about that Mountain West blonde white frumpy housewife stereotype?  Dashed to pieces not only by the South African prayer giver, but also by the musical number performed in Korean by young Korean ladies, an unmarried woman giving the closing prayer, and the lovely southern drawl of one speaker who discussed “wage-earner” as among the roles of many righteous women!  Finally a little recognition for the diversity of female members of the Church-- WE are diverse in language, national origin, marital status, color, income level, career path, etc. and etc!

Here is a LINK and the text (below) to a decent, albeit slightly sensationalized, article about these little changes that I noticed.  I just hope the Church leaders know that I noticed the changes and that I am grateful for them.  It looks like small progress from the outside, but in a Church that simply will NOT compromise on so many things (not necessarily a bad quality!), it is HUGE. 

Thank you to whomever championed this shift; you proved that you love the sisters in the Church by showing respect for all of us, especially those of us who don’t quite fit the mold into which so many people erroneously think we should fit.
 ~
(Originally published in October 2014 on scatterthesunshine.blogspot.com)


~

Mormon Feminists Surprised By New Wording Referring To Women As 'Blessed Disciples Of Jesus'

Posted:

Mormon feminists may have been surprised by some subtle changes in vocabulary and approach Saturday (Sept. 27) at the church’s general women’s meeting.

Dieter F. Uchtdorf addressed the audience — sitting in the giant Conference Center in downtown Salt Lake City or watching via satellite in chapels of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints across the globe — not just as “sisters” but also as “blessed disciples of Jesus Christ.”

In a speech about living out one’s faith joyfully, Uchtdorf, second counselor in the church’s governing First Presidency, referred twice to women as “daughters of heavenly parents,” alluding to the Mormon belief in male and female deities.

And, for the first time, the charismatic German leader described the meeting as the opening session of the church’s 184th Semiannual General Conference. Until now, General Conference has referred only to the two-day gatherings held during the first weekends of April and October, with the women’s meeting seen as a separate event.

Saturday night’s meeting also featured the first-ever prayer at a session of General Conference by a black woman, offered by South African Dorah Mkhabela, a member of the LDS Young Women’s General Board.

These changes come in the wake of wide-ranging conversations about the role of women in the LDS church, including efforts by Ordain Women, a movement pushing to open the church’s all-male priesthood to females. Women prayed for the first time at General Conference in April 2013, and female LDS leaders decided a year later to unite the women’s auxiliaries into a single meeting to parallel the men’s priesthood meeting.

Some feminists also have urged church leaders to talk more openly and often of a Heavenly Mother, who is considered equal to Heavenly Father.

At Saturday’s meeting, women auxiliary leaders talked about being prepared for temple rituals, making covenants and building faith in Jesus Christ, and included “wage earner” among women’s roles.

Linda K. Burton, General Relief Society president for adult women, recounted the biblical parable of the 10 virgins, five of whom were wise because they kept their lamps filled with oil and five considered foolish because they did not.

Church attendance, monthly fasting, preaching, deeds of kindness, chastity and charitable giving, Burton said, build the “oil of spiritual preparation … drop by drop.”

Jean A. Stevens, first counselor in the Primary General Presidency for children under age 12, described the importance of making and keeping promises to God.

“Covenants with God help us to know who we really are. They connect us to him in a personal way where we come to feel our value in his sight and our place in his kingdom,” Stevens said.
Neill F. Marriott, second counselor in the Young Women General Presidency for girls between ages 12 and 17, discussed how Mormon women and girls can use their influence for good.

“We have our own roles on the earth — from daughter, mother, leader and teacher to sister, wage earner, wife and more,” Marriott said. “Each is influential. Each role will have moral power. … Our small acts of faith and service are how most of us can continue in God and eventually bring eternal light and glory to our family, our friends and our associates.”